International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
ISC-AISGF-TBRF
DePaul-2026
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
NSSFIGTMA-2025
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICRTET-4
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 5
September-October 2026
Indexing Partners
Remote Work, Employee Mental Wellbeing, Burnout-Related Responses and Organizational Commitment: An Exploratory Study in Bengaluru
| Author(s) | Reem Abdul Rasheed, Evangelina Supriya |
|---|---|
| Country | United Arab Emirates |
| Abstract | Remote and hybrid work can alter workload, autonomy, social connection and work-home boundaries, but the psychological consequences vary across employees and work contexts. This exploratory cross-sectional study described perceived stress, positive wellbeing, burnout-related responses and organizational-commitment responses among five remote or hybrid employees in Bengaluru, India. A written questionnaire included ten workplace-adapted perceived-stress items, the WHO-Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5), a researcher-selected six-item burnout-related set, and a short six-item organizational-commitment form. Corrected adapted-stress scores were 25, 11, 31, 15 and 22 (M = 20.80, SD = 7.95). WHO-5 scores were 40, 72, 24, 64 and 48 (M = 49.60, SD = 19.10). The informal burnout-related arithmetic index averaged 19.60/36 (SD = 9.96), while raw commitment scores showed very little variation (M = 18.20/30, SD = 0.45). Within this five-person sample, higher adapted-stress scores occurred alongside lower WHO-5 wellbeing and higher burnout-related scores. The very small convenience sample, modified stress wording, abbreviated burnout items and short commitment form prevent population inference, diagnosis or psychometric claims. The findings are best interpreted as a transparent pilot description that highlights the importance of workload, recovery, social connection and measurement quality in future remote-work research. |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 5, September-October 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-10-19 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i05.90063 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI prefix of IJFMR is 10.36948/ijfmr
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals