International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
ISC-AISGF-TBRF
DePaul-2026
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
NSSFIGTMA-2025
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICRTET-4
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 5
September-October 2026
Indexing Partners
Nature, Isolation, and Human Identity in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein: An Ecocritical Reading
| Author(s) | Ms. Adrina Michael Mascarenhas, Prof. Dr. Anil Adagale |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | Mary Shelley's Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus is often seen as a story about hubris in science and the dangers of creation and the horrors of neglect. This essay analyzes Frankenstein in the light of an ecocritical reading, suggesting that nature in Frankenstein is not just a background but an active participant in the psychological and moral development of both Victor Frankenstein and the creature. Victor Frankenstein's attempt to control the dynamics of life and death cuts him off from his family, from society, and from moral duties; he finds solace (and is unable to fully accept it) in the Alpine and Arctic landscapes around him. The creature, on the other hand, makes progress in the realms of sensation, language, sympathy, and self-awareness through contact with cold, hunger, fire, forests, seasonal changes, and through observation of the De Lacey family. But the latter's rejection and lack of companionship divert these powers toward anger and vengeance. This essay argues that in Frankenstein we see an understanding of human identity as relational (not fixed) and constituted through ecological experience, language, sympathy, recognition and responsibility. By reference to Dana Phillips's critique of ecocritical realism and recent work by Shamim/Sahu/Dwivedi, this reading also complicates the simple idea of nature as refuge and frames Frankenstein within current debates on anthropocentrism and environmental ethics. |
| Keywords | Mary Shelley, Frankenstein, ecocriticism, nature, isolation, human identity, scientific ambition, social rejection |
| Field | Arts |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 5, September-October 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-10-21 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI prefix of IJFMR is 10.36948/ijfmr
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals