International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
ISC-AISGF-TBRF
DePaul-2026
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
NSSFIGTMA-2025
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICRTET-4
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 5
September-October 2026
Indexing Partners
Authenticity, Trust And Emotional Connection Toward AI vs. Human Influencers Among Adults Aged 40 Years And Above
| Author(s) | Mr. Shine Sebastian Joseph, Prof. Dr. Shivanand Pawar |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | Artificial intelligence (AI)–generated influencers increasingly mimic human identity and communication, yet their relational reception among adults aged 40 years and above remains understudied. Aim: To compare authenticity, trust, and emotional connection toward AI and human influencers and examine digital literacy, gender, and relationships among these evaluations. Methods: A cross-sectional, within-participant survey enrolled 100 adults aged 40–78 years (51 women, 49 men) by convenience sampling. Respondents evaluated both influencer types using researcher-developed five-item composites. Analyses included paired-samples t-tests, Pearson correlations, a participant-clustered regression, gender comparisons, and a one-sided midpoint test. Results: Human influencers scored higher in authenticity (3.480 vs. 2.864), trust (3.416 vs. 2.686), and emotional connection (3.228 vs. 2.636); all paired p values were < .001. Authenticity correlated positively with trust (human r = .493; AI r = .687), and trust with emotional connection (human r = .585; AI r = .676). The joint regression model explained 60.9% of observed emotional-connection variance, although influencer type was nonsignificant after adjustment. Digital literacy was associated with AI acceptance, not H4 perception outcomes. AI emotional connection was below the neutral midpoint; gender hypotheses were unsupported. Conclusion: Human influencers received stronger relational evaluations, whereas authenticity and trust were important correlates across influencer types. Convenience sampling and limitations of some scales warrant caution. |
| Keywords | Artificial Intelligence Influencers, Human Influencers, Perceived Authenticity, Trust, Emotional Connection, Digital Literacy, Older Adults |
| Field | Sociology > Philosophy / Psychology / Religion |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 5, September-October 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-10-22 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI prefix of IJFMR is 10.36948/ijfmr
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals