International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
ISC-AISGF-TBRF
DePaul-2026
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
NSSFIGTMA-2025
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICRTET-4
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 5
September-October 2026
Indexing Partners
Emergency Cash Buffers and Investment Outcomes During Income Shocks in India
| Author(s) | Ms. Harini R, Mr. Srihari V, Mr. Sreekar Gopavarapu |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | This study examines how emergency-reserve size and withdrawal order affect equity liquidation, reserve recovery and investment-goal affordability for synthetic asset-owning Indian households. A deterministic historical simulation combines monthly Nifty 50 Total Return Index and adjusted HDFC Liquid Fund Direct Growth returns for January 2014 to December 2025. Forty-five scenario definitions, seven reserve sizes and 85 overlapping five-year windows produce 26,775 conditional paths. Household extensions use published urban spending and earnings benchmarks while explicitly varying saving capacity. For the original household facing full income loss during months 12 to 17, a six-month reserve reduces mean spending-funded equity sales from Rs250,000 to Rs5,777, but lowers mean terminal wealth from Rs2,394,214 to Rs2,278,077. Seven months is the smallest tested reserve that eliminates equity sales in every window for this scenario. The six-month policy increases the mean of the lowest 10% of wealth outcomes by Rs35,445 relative to zero reserve. Yet its goal-success share falls from 12.9% to 0% when a common terminal reserve must also be retained. No path with a 5% or 10% initial saving share rebuilds the six-month reserve within the horizon after the full interruption. These findings distinguish immediate spending protection from long-term affordability and recovery capacity. They support conditional policy comparisons rather than a universal reserve recommendation or estimated future success probability. |
| Keywords | Emergency Savings, Household Finance, Income Shocks, Liquidity Reserves, Goal Affordability, India, Historical Simulation |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 5, September-October 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-10-24 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i05.90517 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI prefix of IJFMR is 10.36948/ijfmr
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals