International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
ISC-AISGF-TBRF
DePaul-2026
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
NSSFIGTMA-2025
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICRTET-4
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 6
November-December 2026
Indexing Partners
The Perceived Strengths and Weaknesses of Prevailing Counterterrorism Strategies in Prevention of Terrorism in Uganda
| Author(s) | Mr. Wunyi Aggrey, Bateganya Fred, Butime Herman |
|---|---|
| Country | Uganda |
| Abstract | As a form of response to terrorism, Uganda adopted and developed international, national and local interventions. Despite these interventions, acts of terrorism, particularly terrorism related deaths continue to happen. According to the Global Terrorism Index Report (2024), deaths caused by terrorism increased by 22% to 8,352, the highest level since 2017. Therefore, this research aimed to explore the perceived strengths and weaknesses entailed in the prevailing counterterrorism strategies in Uganda. This study adopted a qualitative methodology and employed an ethnography research design to discover embedded and developing perceptions which are supporting or curtailing interventions. The study targeted returnees, security forces, policy makers, religious leaders, cultural leaders and academia who have a huge stake in anti-terrorism in Uganda. The survey utilized multistage sampling technique to select the study participants. Data was collected using life history interview, scheduled interviews, and focus group discussions. The study explored that targeting individuals showing early signs of radicalization, discouraging individuals susceptibility to extremist ideologies/tackling ideological causes of terrorism, offering psychosocial support and mentoring, offering rehabilitation and reintegration possibilities and integration of prevention, pursuance, protecting and preparing (mitigation) strategies reflect the perceived strengths of intervention. However, disruption of social relation and community trust, how they lead to marginalization and stigmatization, the prevalence of perceived injustices, inequality and lack of opportunity, their failure to enable community involvement and allies, possible inadequacies in meeting global demands and promotion of PPPs with CSOs and local communities form the perceived weaknesses. It was concluded that anti-terrorism measures need to be designed in a manner that strengthens social relations and community trust; avoid marginalization and stigmatization of suspect communities; observe and promote justice, equality and equal opportunity, community involvement and allies while adequately meeting global demands and promoting PPPs with CSOs and local communities. This implied that there is a need to build on the existing strengths in building a cross-cutting and sustainable anti-terrorism intervention framework for Uganda. |
| Keywords | Strengths, Weaknesses, Terrorism, Anti-terror interventions, Returnees |
| Field | Sociology > Intelligence / Security |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 6, November-December 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-11-03 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i06.90744 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI prefix of IJFMR is 10.36948/ijfmr
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals