International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research

E-ISSN: 2582-2160   •   Impact Factor: 9.24

A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal

Call for Paper Volume 8, Issue 6 (November-December 2026) Submit your research before last 3 days of December to publish your research paper in the issue of November-December.

From Housing Delivery to Household Adoption

Author(s) Ms. Nandni Joshi
Country India
Abstract Public housing programmes are often evaluated through houses sanctioned and completed, although the welfare value of a dwelling depends on whether the intended household can actually occupy it. This paper examines the completion–occupancy gap under India’s Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana–Urban (PMAY-U) using parliamentary administrative data and a behavioural-public-economics framework. The Standing Committee on Housing and Urban Affairs reported that, among completed units in two PMAY-U verticals, 4,12,401 of 9,01,953 Affordable Housing in Partnership (AHP) houses and 47,510 of 67,806 In-Situ Slum Redevelopment (ISSR) houses were unoccupied as of its December 2024 report. These figures imply non-occupancy rates of 45.7% and 70.1%, respectively, and 47.4% across the two verticals combined. The higher ISSR rate cautions against treating relocation costs as a sufficient explanation. A Lok Sabha reply dated 19 March 2026 subsequently identified incomplete civic infrastructure, migration or reluctance to leave livelihoods and social networks, beneficiary-share constraints, and documentation and allotment delays as reasons for non-occupancy. It also reported 97.30 lakh completed and 94.83 lakh occupied houses across PMAY-U and PMAY-U 2.0, with legacy Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission (JnNURM) houses included in the aggregate totals. Because the later figures combine programme phases and contain legacy-stock adjustments, they are not directly comparable with the 2024 vertical-specific snapshot. The paper’s contribution is diagnostic rather than causal: it distinguishes structural unavailability from household non-adoption and develops a framework for measuring both. It argues that completion should not be treated as equivalent to effective housing access and proposes reason-coded, stage-wise occupancy monitoring. The available aggregate data do not establish the causal effect or relative importance of behavioural mechanisms.
Keywords PMAY U; housing policy; non-occupancy; household adoption; behavioural public policy; social networks; urban resettlement.
Field Sociology > Economics
Published In Volume 8, Issue 6, November-December 2026
Published On 2026-11-03

Share this