International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
ISC-AISGF-TBRF
DePaul-2026
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
NSSFIGTMA-2025
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICRTET-4
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 6
November-December 2026
Indexing Partners
From Housing Delivery to Household Adoption
| Author(s) | Ms. Nandni Joshi |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | Public housing programmes are often evaluated through houses sanctioned and completed, although the welfare value of a dwelling depends on whether the intended household can actually occupy it. This paper examines the completion–occupancy gap under India’s Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana–Urban (PMAY-U) using parliamentary administrative data and a behavioural-public-economics framework. The Standing Committee on Housing and Urban Affairs reported that, among completed units in two PMAY-U verticals, 4,12,401 of 9,01,953 Affordable Housing in Partnership (AHP) houses and 47,510 of 67,806 In-Situ Slum Redevelopment (ISSR) houses were unoccupied as of its December 2024 report. These figures imply non-occupancy rates of 45.7% and 70.1%, respectively, and 47.4% across the two verticals combined. The higher ISSR rate cautions against treating relocation costs as a sufficient explanation. A Lok Sabha reply dated 19 March 2026 subsequently identified incomplete civic infrastructure, migration or reluctance to leave livelihoods and social networks, beneficiary-share constraints, and documentation and allotment delays as reasons for non-occupancy. It also reported 97.30 lakh completed and 94.83 lakh occupied houses across PMAY-U and PMAY-U 2.0, with legacy Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission (JnNURM) houses included in the aggregate totals. Because the later figures combine programme phases and contain legacy-stock adjustments, they are not directly comparable with the 2024 vertical-specific snapshot. The paper’s contribution is diagnostic rather than causal: it distinguishes structural unavailability from household non-adoption and develops a framework for measuring both. It argues that completion should not be treated as equivalent to effective housing access and proposes reason-coded, stage-wise occupancy monitoring. The available aggregate data do not establish the causal effect or relative importance of behavioural mechanisms. |
| Keywords | PMAY U; housing policy; non-occupancy; household adoption; behavioural public policy; social networks; urban resettlement. |
| Field | Sociology > Economics |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 6, November-December 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-11-03 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI prefix of IJFMR is 10.36948/ijfmr
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals