International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research

E-ISSN: 2582-2160   •   Impact Factor: 9.24

A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal

Call for Paper Volume 8, Issue 6 (November-December 2026) Submit your research before last 3 days of December to publish your research paper in the issue of November-December.

Access, Management and Procedural Intervention-Explorations of Artificial Intelligence Innovation and Judicial Backlog in Indian Judiciary

Author(s) Dr. Shagufta, Susmitha Koritepati
Country India
Abstract The aim of this study is to discuss the problem of case pendency in the judicial system of India that, as of late 2025, violates the right to speedy trial guaranteed by Article 21 of the Constitution due to the number of pending cases exceeding 53 million across the country [1]. As per the data provided by the National Judicial Data Grid, some 88 percent of this pendency falls on subordinate courts, namely district and taluka courts [2, 3]. The factors identified by the study causing delay include the permanent lack of judges to the extent of approximately 35 percent on average, procedural failure in the form of frequent adjournments and counsels' absences, and administrative burden, with the Government being the biggest litigant in almost 46 percent of court cases [4, 5].
The comparative analysis of international judicial artificial intelligence systems like COMPAS of the USA, VICTOR of Brazil, and PROMETEA of Argentina reveals that the key advantage of artificial intelligence is the role of an augmentative nonjudgmental tool used in high volume of appeals triage and document creation [6, 7]. In turn, the digital infrastructure of India, based on the National Judicial Data Grid and e-Courts Phase 3, together with already existing software for legal research and translation in the Supreme Court, creates a solid ground for using of artificial intelligence; however, this process will require rigorous legal governance. In particular, such governance should take care of the threat of algorithmic bias and human supervision, which has been emphasized recently in the guidelines of the Kerala High Court [8].
Keywords Judicial Pendency, National Judicial Data Grid, Artificial Intelligence, Judicial Reform, SUPACE, Procedural Inefficiency
Field Arts
Published In Volume 8, Issue 6, November-December 2026
Published On 2026-11-03
DOI https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i06.91274

Share this