International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
ISC-AISGF-TBRF
DePaul-2026
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
NSSFIGTMA-2025
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICRTET-4
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 6
November-December 2026
Indexing Partners
Access, Management and Procedural Intervention-Explorations of Artificial Intelligence Innovation and Judicial Backlog in Indian Judiciary
| Author(s) | Dr. Shagufta, Susmitha Koritepati |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | The aim of this study is to discuss the problem of case pendency in the judicial system of India that, as of late 2025, violates the right to speedy trial guaranteed by Article 21 of the Constitution due to the number of pending cases exceeding 53 million across the country [1]. As per the data provided by the National Judicial Data Grid, some 88 percent of this pendency falls on subordinate courts, namely district and taluka courts [2, 3]. The factors identified by the study causing delay include the permanent lack of judges to the extent of approximately 35 percent on average, procedural failure in the form of frequent adjournments and counsels' absences, and administrative burden, with the Government being the biggest litigant in almost 46 percent of court cases [4, 5]. The comparative analysis of international judicial artificial intelligence systems like COMPAS of the USA, VICTOR of Brazil, and PROMETEA of Argentina reveals that the key advantage of artificial intelligence is the role of an augmentative nonjudgmental tool used in high volume of appeals triage and document creation [6, 7]. In turn, the digital infrastructure of India, based on the National Judicial Data Grid and e-Courts Phase 3, together with already existing software for legal research and translation in the Supreme Court, creates a solid ground for using of artificial intelligence; however, this process will require rigorous legal governance. In particular, such governance should take care of the threat of algorithmic bias and human supervision, which has been emphasized recently in the guidelines of the Kerala High Court [8]. |
| Keywords | Judicial Pendency, National Judicial Data Grid, Artificial Intelligence, Judicial Reform, SUPACE, Procedural Inefficiency |
| Field | Arts |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 6, November-December 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-11-03 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i06.91274 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI prefix of IJFMR is 10.36948/ijfmr
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals