International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
E-ISSN: 2582-2160
•
Impact Factor: 9.24
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal
Home
Research Paper
Submit Research Paper
Publication Guidelines
Publication Charges
Upload Documents
Track Status / Pay Fees / Download Publication Certi.
Editors & Reviewers
View All
Join as a Reviewer
Get Membership Certificate
Current Issue
Publication Archive
Conference
Publishing Conf. with IJFMR
Upcoming Conference(s) ↓
Conferences Published ↓
ISC-AISGF-TBRF
DePaul-2026
IC-AIRCM-T3-2026
NSSFIGTMA-2025
SPHERE-2025
AIMAR-2025
SVGASCA-2025
ICRTET-4
ICCE-2025
Chinai-2023
PIPRDA-2023
ICMRS'23
Contact Us
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 8 Issue 6
November-December 2026
Indexing Partners
Serve Statistics and Match Outcomes in Tennis: Separating Descriptive Correlates from Genuine Predictors Using Simulation
| Author(s) | Samyak Shah |
|---|---|
| Country | India |
| Abstract | Statistics including first-serve percentage and aces and service points are frequently given as drivers of tennis performance, and machine-learning research frequently classifies match winners based on them. Since these statistics are cumulative up to the time of the match they are supposed to account, they can reflect the outcome but not forecast the outcome. The paper measures such difference through a point-by-point Monte Carlo simulation of 200 seasons (64 players, 50 rounds, best-of-three matches), where the attributes of serve, return and second-serves of each player are the drivers of every point. Five sets of KPI were assessed in logistic regression, linear discriminant analysis, decision trees and support machine with 5-fold cross-validation at n = 90, 180, 360 and 1,000 matches. At n = 180, logistic regression was 90.6% accurate with all post-match KPIs and 86.8% with post-match serve statistics alone, but only 59.2% with pre-match rolling serve statistics (majority-class baseline 53.0%). A pre-match win-rate test score was 66.9 and its inclusion in a test score did not assist (-1.5 points). KPI set accounted 91.4% of accuracy variance; algorithm accounted 1.1%. The choice of features prior to cross-validation resulted in 60.8 percent accuracy using pure noise. Serve statistics are good descriptive correlates of winning but poor prospective predictors; we give a reporting checklist and open code. |
| Keywords | tennis analytics; serve statistics; data leakage; match outcome prediction; cross-validation; Monte Carlo simulation |
| Published In | Volume 8, Issue 6, November-December 2026 |
| Published On | 2026-11-07 |
Share this

E-ISSN 2582-2160
CrossRef DOI prefix of IJFMR is 10.36948/ijfmr
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.
Powered by Sky Research Publication and Journals