Evaluating Empathetic Decision-Making In AI: A Comparative Study Of Open-Source Models In High-Stakes Scenarios

Author(s)	Mr. Joshua Fernandes
Country	India
Abstract	Artificial intelligence is increasingly used in high-stakes situations such as military operations, medical triage, and humanitarian crises. While these systems optimise accuracy and efficiency, they often fail to account for empathy, which is essential for ethical decision-making. This study compares the empathetic reasoning abilities of open-source AI models, including GPT-J, LLaMA 2, BLOOM, decision tree, and random forest classifiers, across curated military, medical, emotional, and India-specific moral dilemmas. Models were evaluated on decision accuracy, empathy alignment score, explanation quality, and consistency. ANOVA results show no significant difference in decision accuracy (F=0.55, p=0.703) but highly significant differences in empathy alignment (F=121.99, p<0.001) and explanation quality (F=26.92, p<0.001). GPT-J demonstrated the highest empathy alignment, while interpretable models showed lower empathy but higher consistency. The findings highlight the need for hybrid systems that combine empathetic reasoning with stable and interpretable decision pathways.
Keywords	AI Empathy, Ethical Decision-Making, Explainable AI, Moral Dilemmas, Computational Ethics, Open-Source Models
Field	Computer > Artificial Intelligence / Simulation / Virtual Reality
Published In	Volume 7, Issue 6, November-December 2025
Published On	2025-12-13
DOI	https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i06.63345

About IJFMR Fees & Payment Current Issue Publication Archive	Submit Research Paper Track Submission Status Publication Guidelines Publication Ethics Peer Review & Plagiarism	Join as a Reviewer Editors & Reviewers Reviewer Referral Program Get Reviewer Membership Certi.	Website/Journal Policies Usage Policy Content Policies Privacy Policy

Contact Us		+91-9687-828-838	editor@ijfmr.com

International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research