International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research

E-ISSN: 2582-2160   •   Impact Factor: 9.24

A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Bi-monthly Scholarly International Journal

Call for Paper Volume 8, Issue 5 (September-October 2026) Submit your research before last 3 days of October to publish your research paper in the issue of September-October.

Evaluating Poisoning Resistance and Blockchain Provenance in Federated Intrusion Detection Across Institutions

Author(s) Mr. Srijib Samanta
Country India
Abstract Abstract:
Institutions can share intrusion detection models without pooling their network records, but federated learning remains vulnerable to corrupted training updates. Collaborative training also creates a need to reconstruct how a deployed model was produced and approved. This conceptual paper develops an architecture and evaluation protocol that examine poisoning resistance and auditability as separate outcomes. A focused review informs an institutional threat model, off-chain update screening, robust aggregation and permissioned records of model lineage. The protocol compares ordinary federated averaging, independently witnessed signed logs and blockchain-backed coordination under matched training conditions. Public intrusion detection datasets support controlled institutional partitions, which are distinguished from real deployments. The analysis shows why authenticated provenance cannot establish label correctness or update safety. It identifies targeted attack success, worst-institution detection performance, honest-client exclusion, evidence reconstruction and infrastructure cost as complementary evaluation endpoints. No training experiments or measured improvements are reported. The contribution is a controlled study design for determining whether shared ledger custody offers practical accountability beyond a strong signed-log alternative.
Keywords: federated learning; intrusion detection; model poisoning; permissioned blockchain; provenance; institutional cybersecurity.
Keywords Abstract: Institutions can share intrusion detection models without pooling their network records, but federated learning remains vulnerable to corrupted training updates. Collaborative training also creates a need to reconstruct how a deployed model was produced and approved. This conceptual paper develops an architecture and evaluation protocol that examine poisoning resistance and auditability as separate outcomes. A focused review informs an institutional threat model, off-chain update screening, robust aggregation and permissioned records of model lineage. The protocol compares ordinary federated averaging, independently witnessed signed logs and blockchain-backed coordination under matched training conditions. Public intrusion detection datasets support controlled institutional partitions, which are distinguished from real deployments. The analysis shows why authenticated provenance cannot establish label correctness or update safety. It identifies targeted attack success, worst-institution detection performance, honest-client exclusion, evidence reconstruction and infrastructure cost as complementary evaluation endpoints. No training experiments or measured improvements are reported. The contribution is a controlled study design for determining whether shared ledger custody offers practical accountability beyond a strong signed-log alternative. Keywords: federated learning; intrusion detection; model poisoning; permissioned blockchain; provenance; institutional cybersecurity.
Field Engineering
Published In Volume 8, Issue 5, September-October 2026
Published On 2026-10-21

Share this